Plovdiv: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket is pricing the USDC-settled, Polygon-based conditional token contract for Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva at **100% YES** to Mrva, which implies the market is treating his advance as a near-certainty rather than a live contest on the set score. The contract resolves on who advances, not on game count or margin, and if the match is not played or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner it falls to 50-50 under the rules in the description.

That reading fits the broader pre-match framing: this is a first-round Plovdiv Challenger meeting on clay, with no ATP head-to-head history between the two players.[1][2][5] External previews also lean Mrva’s way, with Tennis Tonic listing him as the pick and giving initial odds of 1.333 for Mrva versus 2.96 for Compagnucci.[1] TennisTemple’s player data shows Mrva ranked higher than Compagnucci, which helps explain why the market is pinned at the top end even before any live scoreline is considered.[6]

For a trader, the key catalysts are not abstract form trends but whether the match starts on schedule, is completed, or is pushed outside the seven-day settlement window. The event listings place the match in Plovdiv on clay and mark it as a round-of-32 type challenger fixture, with live coverage pages already up on Sofascore, Flashscore and Tennis.com, so any withdrawal, walkover, postponement or score-keeping update should feed quickly into how the contract is interpreted.[2][3][4][8] SuperTennis also described Compagnucci as drawing the tournament’s second seed, which reinforces that the market is reacting to seeding and draw structure rather than any verified head-to-head edge.[7]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Plovdiv: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Scam?, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Scam? is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Scam??

Zero. Polymarket Scam? routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Scam? triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.