LoL: ZYB Esport vs Skillcamp Esport (BO1) - LFL Regular Season

Platform comparison

Market context

Polymarket currently has this **ZYB Esport vs Skillcamp Esport** LoL contract priced at **0% YES**, so the market is assigning no value to a ZYB win in the LFL Regular Season match. On Polymarket, that means traders are effectively paying USDC on Polygon for conditional tokens that settle to the event outcome, with the contract resolving on the official match result rather than the pre-match narrative.

For context, the cleanest read on a 0% line is usually not “impossible”, but “the market thinks the outcome is already effectively locked or the contract is stale”. Comparable esports markets often move sharply only when an official result lands, because if gameplay begins and ends with a referee-awarded win, settlement follows the organiser’s ruling; if the match is cancelled, postponed too long, or never played, resolution can fall back to 50-50 or fair market price depending on venue rules.[2] In this case, one external results page already lists ZYB as the winner by 1–0 in 40 minutes, which would align with a near-zero probability on the remaining unresolved side.[1]

The main catalysts for traders are official LFL schedule updates, any change to the broadcast or lobby status, and whether the result is fully published by the tournament organiser before the settlement window closes. Because the market description allows 50-50 if the match is not played, tied, or delayed beyond seven days, the key operational risk is not team strength but event administration: late cancellations, replay rulings, or a result that is still unconfirmed in the official system.

Sources: 1 · 2

Methodology

This page reviews LoL: ZYB Esport vs Skillcamp Esport (BO1) - LFL Regular Season across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Polymarket Scam?, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Polymarket Scam?. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Polymarket Scam? trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.