Dota 2: 4ikibamboni vs Power Rangers (BO3) - European Pro League Playoffs

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket is pricing the 4ikibamboni–Power Rangers BO3 on Polygon in USDC through conditional tokens, and the crowd is currently assigning **0% YES**, which means the contract is effectively treating a 4ikibamboni win as outside today’s consensus. The underlying match is the European Pro League Playoffs upper bracket final, with settlement tied to the actual series result rather than the title alone; if the match is not completed in line with the market rules, the contract can still resolve to 50-50.

The main context for reading that 0% is that these teams have already met in European Pro League Season 38, where 4ikibamboni won 2-1 on 14 June 2026 in a best-of-three. That prior result matters because repeat matchups in the same event often feed short-term price anchoring, especially when the same roster cores and map patterns carry over from the group stage into the playoffs. Liquipedia’s season page also places both sides in the same tournament field, reinforcing that this is a direct rematch rather than a fresh pairing from a new competition.[1][2][4]

For traders, the immediate catalysts are simple: whether the upper bracket final actually goes ahead, whether the official bracket keeps the scheduled BO3 slot, and whether any roster or timing change appears before the settlement window closes. Live listings from Bo3.gg and GosuGamers show the match as a BO3 in the same tournament, while the market’s own rules mean a cancellation, no-contest, or long delay can override the game result and send the contract to 50-50 instead of a team win.[2][3]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Scam? is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Scam??

Zero. Polymarket Scam? routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Scam? triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.