Counter-Strike: KUUSAMO.gg vs Passion Academy (BO3) - United21 Group D

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

KUUSAMO.gg has already defeated Passion Academy 2–1 in their United21 Season 51 Group D elimination match, which concluded earlier today at 10:30 UTC. The prediction market currently prices the "KUUSAMO.gg wins" outcome at 0% YES, reflecting the on-chain reality that the event has settled and the winner is confirmed. On Polymarket, this contract resolves via conditional tokens on the Polygon network using USDC, meaning the 0% price is not a speculative forecast but a mechanical acknowledgment of the completed result.

Historically, similar esports markets where the underlying match finished before settlement windows closed have consistently collapsed to 0% or 100% immediately, as conditional tokens auto-execute based on the verified outcome. In past United21 seasons, such as Season 48 where KUUSAMO.gg dominated Group D with a 2–0 record, markets resolved instantly once the final score was logged on Liquipedia, leaving no room for lingering probability drift. The current 0% price aligns with this precedent, confirming the match is not merely delayed but fully resolved.

Traders should monitor official tournament announcements for any rare post-match disputes or administrative cancellations that could trigger the 50–50 tie clause, though none are expected given the clear 2–1 result. Recent coverage on Bo3.gg confirms the final score and streaming availability, while Sofascore lists the match as completed with no pending delays. With the settlement window ending on 22 June 2026 at 16:30 UTC, the on-chain mechanics will lock in KUUSAMO.gg as the winner, rendering further trading irrelevant.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Counter-Strike: KUUSAMO.gg vs Passion Academy (BO3) - United21 Group D across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Polymarket Scam? — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Scam?, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Scam? is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Scam? triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.