Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Scam?) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 100% |
| Map Handicap: ICE (-1.5) vs Acend (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Winner | 100% |
| Map 3 Winner | 100% |
| Map 4 Winner | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 5 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ICE (-2.5) vs Acend (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 4 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-6.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-1.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-2.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-3.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
Market context
The Counter-Strike 2 grand final between Inner Circle Esports and Acend, scheduled for 28 June in Romania, has already concluded with Inner Circle securing a decisive victory. On-chain data from Polymarket confirms the contract now trades at 100% YES for Inner Circle, reflecting the settled outcome where the British team defeated Acend 3–1 in the best-of-five series. The conditional tokens, settled in USDC on the Polygon network, have locked in the payout, leaving no exposure for traders who entered before the match completion.
Historically, 100% pricing in esports prediction markets typically signals a resolved event rather than an overwhelming pre-match favourite, as seen in previous Kalshi and Polymarket contracts where odds snapped to certainty post-match. In comparable cases, such as the GamerLegion versus Acend match in the same tournament, the market only reached full certainty after the final map concluded, with Acend advancing to the Upper Bracket Semi-Finals following a 2–1 win [1]. This pattern confirms that the current 100% price is a settlement marker, not a pre-game probability assessment.
Traders should monitor official Liquipedia updates and tournament announcements for any post-match resolution confirmations or potential delays in payout distribution, though the match result is final. The Digital Crusade Super DraculaN Season 1 final, featuring a £150,000 prize pool, has been officially recorded with Inner Circle as the winner [5]. No further catalysts exist, as the settlement window closes on 28 June 2026, and the USDC payouts are already queued for distribution to YES holders.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Scam?, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Polymarket Scam?. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Counter-Strike: Inner Circle Esports vs Acend (BO5) … on Polymarket Scam?
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →